This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (30)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Statistics and Research Methods  • Alert me on articles by topic

A Response to the Report of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission

John M. Oldham, MD; Stephan Haimowitz, JD; Susan J. Delano

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:688-693.

For the last several years, the National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC) has considered several complex issues relating to biomedical research. Prominent among these considerations has been the protection of the rights and welfare of human research subjects, and the NBAC recently submitted to the president a report entitled Research Involving Persons With Mental Disorders That May Affect Decisionmaking Capacity. The importance of careful protection of vulnerable populations from undue or inappropriate risk in human subject research cannot be overemphasized, and the NBAC report includes recommendations that would strengthen such protection. However, the creation of workable mechanisms that allow appropriate risk-benefit judgments and that preserve respect for the autonomy of participating research subjects is challenging indeed. We believe that the NBAC has developed recommendations that strengthen protections for individual research participants. However, several key elements of the report are stigmatizing to persons with psychiatric disorders, and they could, if adopted as new federal regulations, inappropriately impede critical categories of psychiatric research.

From the New York State Psychiatric Institute (Dr Oldham); New York State Office of Mental Health (Mr Haimowitz); and the Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene Inc (Ms Delano), New York.

RELATED ARTICLES

Almost Persuaded: Reactions to Oldham et al
James F. Childress and Harold T. Shapiro
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(8):697-698.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The National Bioethics Advisory Commission Report: The Response of the Psychiatric Research Community Is Critical to Restoring Public Trust
Dennis S. Charney
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(8):699-700.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Protecting Vulnerable Research Subjects Without Unduly Constraining Neuropsychiatric Research
Franklin G. Miller and Joseph J. Fins
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(8):701-702.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reply
John M. Oldham, Stephan Haimowitz, and Susan J. Delano
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(8):703-704.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Summary of Important Documents in the Field of Research Ethics
Fischer
Schizophr Bull 2006;32:69-80.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Emerging Empirical Evidence on the Ethics of Schizophrenia Research
Dunn et al.
Schizophr Bull 2006;32:47-68.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Magnitude of Impairment in Decisional Capacity in People With Schizophrenia Compared to Normal Subjects: An Overview
Jeste et al.
Schizophr Bull 2006;32:121-128.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Vulnerable Research Participants: Anyone May Qualify
Jacobson
Nurs Sci Q 2005;18:359-363.
ABSTRACT  

Capacity of Forensic Patients to Consent to Research: The Use of the MacCAT-CR
McDermott et al.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2005;33:299-307.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Capacity to Provide Informed Consent for Participation in Schizophrenia and HIV Research
Moser et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2002;159:1201-1207.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

National Depressive and Manic-Depressive Association Consensus Statement on the Use of Placebo in Clinical Trials of Mood Disorders
Charney et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002;59:262-270.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Enhancing Comprehension of Consent for Research in Older Patients With Psychosis: A Randomized Study of a Novel Consent Procedure
Dunn et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2001;158:1911-1913.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Challenges to Human Subject Protections in US Medical Research
Woodward
JAMA 1999;282:1947-1952.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Almost Persuaded: Reactions to Oldham et al
Childress and Shapiro
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;56:697-698.
FULL TEXT  

The National Bioethics Advisory Commission Report: The Response of the Psychiatric Research Community Is Critical to Restoring Public Trust
Charney
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;56:699-700.
FULL TEXT  

Protecting Vulnerable Research Subjects Without Unduly Constraining Neuropsychiatric Research
Miller and Fins
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;56:701-702.
FULL TEXT