This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on ISI (31)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Psychiatry, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic

Challenges for Psychiatric Epidemiology

Jane M. Murphy, PhD; Richard R. Monson, MD, DSc; Nan M. Laird, PhD; Arthur M. Sobol, MA; Alexander H. Leighton, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57:230-236.

Background  High prevalence rates in psychiatric epidemiologic studies raise questions about whether data-gathering procedures identify transient responses rather than clinical disorders. This issue is explored relevant to depression using data from the Stirling County Study.

Methods  The study's customary method, the DPAX (DP for depression and AX for anxiety) was compared with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS), both of which were administered to a sample of 1396 subjects selected in 1992. Reasons for discordance were analyzed, and demographic correlates of responses to questions about dysphoria were examined. These lay-administered interviews were then compared with clinician-administered interviews that used the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) with 139 subjects. The statistic and logistic regression were used for statistical assessment.

Results  For the level of agreement between the DPAX and the DIS for current and lifetime depression, = 0.40 and = 0.33, respectively. Subjects diagnosed only by the DPAX tended to have less education than those diagnosed only by the DIS. Some idioms for dysphoria seemed to work better than others. Using SCID interviews as a clinical standard, the DPAX had 15% sensitivity and 96% specificity and the DIS had 25% sensitivity and 98% specificity.

Conclusions  Comprehension of an interview can be improved by using multiple questions for dysphoria and a simpler mode of inquiry. Clinician-administered interviews tend to corroborate disorders identified in lay-administered interviews but suggest that survey methods underestimate prevalence. Further research is needed to evaluate the validity of both types of interviews, but evidence from a 16-year follow-up evaluation indicates that depression diagnosed by the DPAX is a serious disorder in terms of morbidity and mortality.

From the Departments of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital (Dr Murphy and Mr Sobol); the Departments of Epidemiology (Drs Murphy and Monson) and Biostatistics (Dr Laird), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass; and the Departments of Psychiatry and of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia (Dr Leighton).

RELATED ARTICLES

A 40-Year Perspective on the Prevalence of Depression: The Stirling County Study
Jane M. Murphy, Nan M. Laird, Richard R. Monson, Arthur M. Sobol, and Alexander H. Leighton
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(3):209-215.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Self-report and Clinical Diagnostic Interviews for Depression: Diagnostic Interview Schedule and Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry in the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area Follow-up
William W. Eaton, Karen Neufeld, Li-Shiun Chen, and Guojun Cai
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(3):217-222.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Community Diagnosis Counts
Darrel A. Regier
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(3):223-224.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Controversies in Community-Based Psychiatric Epidemiology: Let the Data Speak for Themselves
Dan G. Blazer II and Berton H. Kaplan
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(3):227-228.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT