You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 57 No. 5, May 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (203)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Comparison of Bilateral and Right Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy at Different Stimulus Intensities

Harold A. Sackeim, PhD; Joan Prudic, MD; D. P. Devanand, MD; Mitchell S. Nobler, MD; Sarah H. Lisanby, MD; Shoshana Peyser, CSW, MPH; Linda Fitzsimons, RN; Bobba J. Moody, MSW; Jenifer Clark, MA

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57:425-434.

Background  Controversy persists about the use of right unilateral (RUL) and bilateral (BL) electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). While RUL ECT results in less severe short-term and long-term cognitive effects, there is concern that it is less efficacious than BL ECT.

Methods  In a double-blind study, 80 depressed patients were randomized to RUL ECT, with electrical dosages 50%, 150%, or 500% above the seizure threshold, or BL ECT, with an electrical dosage 150% above the threshold. Depression severity and cognitive functioning were assessed before, during, immediately after, and 2 months after ECT. Compared with baseline, responders had at least a 60% reduction in symptom scores 1 week after ECT, and were monitored for relapse for 1 year.

Results  High-dosage RUL and BL ECT were equivalent in response rate (65%) and approximately twice as effective as low-dosage (35%) or moderate-dosage (30%) unilateral ECT. During the week after the randomized phase, BL ECT resulted in greater impairment than any dosage of unilateral ECT in several measures of anterograde and retrograde memory. Two months after ECT, retrograde amnestic deficits were greatest among patients treated with BL ECT. Thirty-three (53%) of the 62 patients who responded to ECT relapsed, without treatment group differences. The relapse rate was greater in patients who had not responded to adequate pharmacotherapy prior to ECT and who had more severe depressive symptoms after ECT.

Conclusion  Right unilateral ECT at high dosage is as effective as a robust form of BL ECT, but produces less severe and persistent cognitive effects.


From the Department of Biological Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and the Departments of Psychiatry (Drs Sackeim, Prudic, Devanand, Nobler, and Lisanby and Mss Peyser and Moody), Radiology (Dr Sackeim), and Neurology (Dr Devanand), Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.


RELATED ARTICLES

Titrated Moderately Suprathreshold vs Fixed High-Dose Right Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy: Acute Antidepressant and Cognitive Effects
W. Vaughn McCall, David M. Reboussin, Richard D. Weiner, and Harold A. Sackeim
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(5):438-444.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Electroconvulsive Therapy Requires Higher Dosage Levels: Food and Drug Administration Action Is Required
Richard Abrams
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(5):445-446.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.