You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 58 No. 10, October 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (71)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Schizophrenia
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Clozapine and Haloperidol in Moderately Refractory Schizophrenia

A 6-Month Randomized and Double-blind Comparison

John M. Kane, MD; Stephen R. Marder, MD; Nina R. Schooler, PhD; William C. Wirshing, MD; Daniel Umbricht, MD; Robert W. Baker, MD; Donna A. Wirshing, MD; Allan Safferman, MD; Rohan Ganguli, MD; Marjorie McMeniman, PhD; Michael Borenstein, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:965-972.

Background  Despite the demonstrated efficacy of clozapine in severely refractory schizophrenia, questions remain regarding its efficacy for primary negative symptoms, comparison with a moderate dose of a first-generation antipsychotic, and adverse effects during a longer-term trial. This study examined its efficacy in partially responsive, community-based patients, compared clozapine with moderate-dose haloperidol, and extended treatment to 6 months.

Methods  Randomized, double-blind, 29-week trial comparing clozapine (n = 37) with haloperidol (n = 34). Subjects with schizophrenia who were being treated in community settings at 3 collaborating clinical facilities were enrolled.

Results  Subjects treated with haloperidol were significantly more likely to discontinue treatment for lack of efficacy (51%) than were those treated with clozapine (12%). A higher proportion of clozapine-treated subjects met an a priori criterion of improvement (57%) compared with haloperidol-treated subjects (25%). Significantly greater improvement was seen in symptoms of psychosis, hostile-suspiciousness, anxiety-depression, thought disturbance, and total score measured on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. No differences were detected in negative symptoms using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale or the Schedule for Assessment of Negative Symptoms. Subjects treated with clozapine experienced more excess salivation, dizziness, and sweating and less dry mouth and decreased appetite than those treated with haloperidol.

Conclusions  Compared with a first-generation antipsychotic given in a moderate dose, clozapine offers substantial clinical benefits to treatment-refractory subjects who can be treated in the community. Advantages are seen in a broad range of symptoms but do not extend to negative symptoms.


From the Department of Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, North Shore–Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY (Drs Kane, Umbricht, Safferman, McMeniman, and Borenstein); the Department of Psychiatry, West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif (Drs Marder, W. C. Wirshing, and D. A. Wirshing); and the Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (Drs Schooler, Baker, and Ganguli). Dr Schooler is now with the Department of Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital; Dr Umbricht, the Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; Dr Baker, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Ind; and Dr Safferman, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY.

Corresponding author and reprints: John M. Kane, MD, Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY 11004.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Dropout Rates in Randomized Clinical Trials of Antipsychotics: A Meta-analysis Comparing First- and Second-Generation Drugs and an Examination of the Role of Trial Design Features
Rabinowitz et al.
Schizophr Bull 2008;0:sbn005v1-sbn005.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Randomized Trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate Antagonist in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression.
Zarate et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006;63:856-864.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Open Forum: Effectiveness Versus Efficacy of Second-Generation Antipsychotics: Haloperidol Without Anticholinergics as a Comparator
Rosenheck
Psychiatr. Serv. 2005;56:85-92.
FULL TEXT  

Olanzapine Treatment of Residual Positive and Negative Symptoms
Buchanan et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2005;162:124-129.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Equivalent Occupancy of Dopamine D1 and D2 Receptors With Clozapine: Differentiation From Other Atypical Antipsychotics
Tauscher et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2004;161:1620-1625.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Analysing the efficacy of clozapine
Karunakaran
Br. J. Psychiatry 2004;184:539-539.
FULL TEXT  

Author's reply
Kho and Moncrieff
Br. J. Psychiatry 2004;184:539-540.
FULL TEXT  

The Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale-Revisited
Barnes
J Psychopharmacol 2003;17:365-370.
ABSTRACT  

Schizophrenia
Freedman
NEJM 2003;349:1738-1749.
FULL TEXT  

Maintenance Treatment of Schizophrenia With Risperidone or Haloperidol: 2-Year Outcomes
Marder et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2003;160:1405-1412.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Relationship of Clozapine and Haloperidol Treatment Response to Prefrontal, Hippocampal, and Caudate Brain Volumes
Arango et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2003;160:1421-1427.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clozapine v. conventional antipsychotic drugs for treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a re-examination
MONCRIEFF
Br. J. Psychiatry 2003;183:161-166.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relapse Prevention in Schizophrenia With New-Generation Antipsychotics: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials
Leucht et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2003;160:1209-1222.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Second-Generation Antipsychotics
Davis et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:553-564.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.