This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (17)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Medical Practice, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic

Robert A. Rosenheck, MD; Deborah Dennis, MA

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:1073-1080.

Background  The assertive community treatment (ACT) model for people with severe mental illness was originally designed to be provided continuously without termination. This study evaluated postdischarge changes in health status and service use associated with the time-limited provision of ACT to homeless people with severe mental illness.

Methods  Clients in the fourth annual cohort of the Access to Community Care and Effective Services and Supports (ACCESS) program (N = 1617) were assessed at entry into ACT and 3, 12, and 18 months later. Random effects models were used to compare outcomes and service use among clients who terminated ACT and clients who remained in ACT, controlling for potentially confounding factors.

Results  Altogether, of clients who participated in follow-up, 8.7% participated for less than 3 months; 40.6%, for 3 to 10 months; 15.3%, for 11-13 months; and 35.3%, for 14 months or more. Controlling for potentially confounding factors, mental health, substance abuse, and housing outcomes did not significantly differ between clients who had been discharged at the time of follow-up as compared with those who had not. Those who had been discharged had worked significantly more days than those who had not (t₁₇₉₄ = 3.24, P<.001), and they reported significantly less outpatient health service use though there was no decline in hospital days or receipt of public support payments.

Conclusion  Homeless clients who have severe mental illness can be selectively discharged or transferred from ACT to other services without subsequent loss of gains in mental health status, substance abuse, housing, or employment.

From the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Yale Medical School, West Haven, Conn (Dr Rosenheck); and Policy Research Associates, Delmar, NY (Ms Dennis).

Corresponding author and reprints: Robert A. Rosenheck, MD, 182 Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Haven, CT 06516 (e-mail: robert.rosenheck{at}yale.edu).

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Multicenter Trial of Intensive Early Intervention vs Standard Treatment for Patients With a First Episode of Psychotic Illness: The OPUS Trial
Bertelsen et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008;65:762-771.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effectiveness of Assertive Community Treatment for Homeless Populations With Severe Mental Illness: A Meta-Analysis
Coldwell and Bender
Am. J. Psychiatry 2007;164:393-399.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Homelessness and Utilization of Mental Health Services Among 10,340 Patients With Serious Mental Illness in a Large Public Mental Health System
Folsom et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2005;162:370-376.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of Supported Housing for Homeless Persons With Mental Illness
Rosenheck et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:940-951.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Service Systems Integration and Outcomes for Mentally Ill Homeless Persons in the ACCESS Program
Rosenheck et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2002;53:958-966.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lessons From the Evaluation of the ACCESS Program
Goldman et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2002;53:967-969.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT