You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 61 No. 4, April 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Correction
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (47)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Psychiatry, Other
 •Quality of Life
 •Transplantation, Other
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Effects of Perceived Treatment on Quality of Life and Medical Outcomes in a Double-blind Placebo Surgery Trial

Cynthia McRae, PhD; Eva Cherin, MA; T. Gayle Yamazaki, PhD; Gretchen Diem, PhD; Alexander H. Vo, PhD; Dan Russell, PhD; J. Heiner Ellgring, PhD; Stanley Fahn, MD; Paul Greene, MD; Sandra Dillon, RN; Hal Winfield, RN; Kimberly B. Bjugstad, PhD; Curt R. Freed, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61:412-420.

Context  This study was part of a large double-blind sham surgery–controlled trial designed to determine the effectiveness of transplantation of human embryonic dopamine neurons into the brains of persons with advanced Parkinson's disease. This portion of the study investigated the quality of life (QOL) of participants during the 1 year of double-blind follow-up.

Objectives  To determine whether QOL improved more in the transplant group than in the sham surgery group and to investigate outcomes at 1 year based on perceived treatment (the type of surgery patients thought they received).

Design  Participants were randomly assigned to receive either the transplant or sham surgery. Reported results are from the 1-year double-blind period.

Setting  Participants were recruited from across the United States and Canada. Assessment and surgery were conducted at 2 separate university medical centers.

Participants  A volunteer sample of 40 persons with idiopathic Parkinson's disease participated in the transplant ("parent") study, and 30 agreed to participate in the related QOL study: 12 received the transplant and 18 received sham surgery.

Interventions  Interventions in the parent study were transplantation and sham brain surgery. Assessments of QOL were made at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 months after surgery.

Main Outcome Measures  Comparison of the actual transplant and sham surgery groups and the perceived treatment groups on QOL and medical outcomes. We also investigated change over time.

Results  There were 2 differences or changes over time in the transplant and sham surgery groups. Based on perceived treatment, or treatment patients thought they received, there were numerous differences and changes over time. In all cases, those who thought they received the transplant reported better scores. Blind ratings by medical staff showed similar results.

Conclusions  The placebo effect was very strong in this study, demonstrating the value of placebo-controlled surgical trials.


From the College of Education, University of Denver, Denver, Colo (Drs McRae and Yamazaki and Ms Cherin); Behavioral Medicine Department, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, Calif (Dr Diem); Division of Neurosciences, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Md (Dr Vo); Human Development and Family Studies, Iowa State University, Ames (Dr Russell); Institute of Psychology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany (Dr Ellgring); Neurological Institute, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY (Drs Fahn and Greene, Ms Dillon, and Mr Winfield); and the Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver (Drs Bjugstad and Freed).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Training Effects Outweigh Effects of Single-Session Conventional rTMS and Theta Burst Stimulation in PD Patients
Rothkegel et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:373-381.
ABSTRACT  

Bilateral subthalamic stimulation impairs cognitive-motor performance in Parkinson's disease patients
Alberts et al.
Brain 2008;131:3348-3360.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Placebo effects: clinical aspects and neurobiology
Oken
Brain 2008;131:2812-2823.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

NEUROSURGERY AT AN EARLIER STAGE OF PARKINSON DISEASE
Beukers et al.
Neurology 2007;69:811-812.
FULL TEXT  

Carotid body autotransplantation in Parkinson disease: a clinical and positron emission tomography study
Minguez-Castellanos et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2007;78:825-831.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Benefits, risks and ethical considerations in translation of stem cell research to clinical applications in Parkinson's disease
Master et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2007;33:169-173.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Placebo/Nocebo Symptom Reporting in a Sham Herbal Supplement Trial
Link et al.
Eval Health Prof 2006;29:394-406.
ABSTRACT  

Interpreting Surgical Trials With Subjective Outcomes: Avoiding UnSPORTsmanlike Conduct
Flum
JAMA 2006;296:2483-2485.
FULL TEXT  

Science and Ethics of Sham Surgery: A Survey of Parkinson Disease Clinical Researchers
Kim et al.
Arch Neurol 2005;62:1357-1360.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.