You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 62 No. 9, September 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (28)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Psychopharmacology
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Comparative and Interactive Human Psychopharmacologic Effects of Ketamine and Amphetamine

Implications for Glutamatergic and Dopaminergic Model Psychoses and Cognitive Function

John H. Krystal, MD; Edward B. Perry, Jr, MD; Ralitza Gueorguieva, PhD; Aysenil Belger, PhD; Steven H. Madonick, MD; Anissa Abi-Dargham, MD; Thomas B. Cooper, MA; Lisa MacDougall, MA; Walid Abi-Saab, MD; D. Cyril D’Souza, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:985-994.

Background  In healthy individuals, ketamine hydrochloride and amphetamine sulfate produce cognitive, behavioral, and subjective effects resembling endogenous psychoses. Studying the comparative and interactive effects of these agents may provide insights into the roles of the glutamate and monoamine systems in psychosis and cognition.

Objectives  To directly compare the effects of ketamine and amphetamine and to explore their interactive effects within individuals.

Design  Placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind psychopharmacologic trial.

Setting and Participants  Forty-one healthy individuals recruited from the community who completed up to 4 test days.

Main Outcome Measures  On each test day, participants received amphetamine (a 1-minute infusion of amphetamine sulfate, 0.25 mg/kg, or saline) and ketamine (a 1-minute intravenous infusion of ketamine, 0.23 mg/kg, followed by a 1-hour infusion of 0.5 mg/kg or an identical saline bolus and infusion). The order of amphetamine and ketamine infusions was randomized.

Results  At the doses studied, ketamine and amphetamine produced positive symptoms and euphoria. However, perceptual changes were produced only by ketamine, and hostility, grandiosity, and somatic concern were stimulated only by amphetamine. Amphetamine and ketamine produced conceptual disorganization, but only ketamine produced concrete ideation and unusual mannerisms. Ketamine produced negative symptoms and disrupted delayed recall. Ketamine and amphetamine showed 3 types of interactive effects: (1) amphetamine attenuated the impairment of working memory produced by ketamine; (2) amphetamine and ketamine had additive effects on thought disorder, arousal, and euphoria; and (3) amphetamine and ketamine had less-than-additive effects on psychosis.

Conclusions  These findings implicate N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptors and dopamine systems in psychosis. However, glutamate and dopamine may differentially contribute to psychosis, thought disorder, and euphoria. Regarding medication development for cognitive dysfunction, the pattern of the interactive effects of ketamine and amphetamine is consistent with the hypothesis that facilitation of prefrontal cortical dopamine levels would attenuate some cognitive impairments associated with deficits in N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor function.


Author Affiliations: Department of Psychiatry (Drs Krystal, Perry, Belger, and D’Souza and Ms MacDougall) and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health (Dr Gueorguieva), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Schizophrenia Biological Research Center (116-A), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven (Drs Krystal, Perry, Belger, and D’Souza and Ms MacDougall); Abraham Ribicoff Research Facilities, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven (Drs Krystal, Perry, Gueorguieva, and D’Souza and Ms MacDougall); Institute of Living, Hartford, Conn (Dr Madonick); New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Department of Psychiatry, New York (Dr Abi-Dargham and Mr Cooper); and Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill (Dr Abi-Saab). Dr Belger is now with the Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Dysfunctional and Compensatory Prefrontal Cortical Systems, Genes and the Pathogenesis of Schizophrenia
Tan et al.
Cereb Cortex 2007;17:i171-i181.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Epistasis between catechol-O-methyltransferase and type II metabotropic glutamate receptor 3 genes on working memory brain function
Tan et al.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007;104:12536-12541.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Review: Glutamate and dopamine dysregulation in schizophrenia a synthesis and selective review
Stone et al.
J Psychopharmacol 2007;21:440-452.
ABSTRACT  

From prediction error to psychosis: ketamine as a pharmacological model of delusions
Corlett et al.
J Psychopharmacol 2007;21:238-252.
ABSTRACT  

Ketamine effects on CNS responses assessed with MEG/EEG in a passive auditory sensory-gating paradigm: an attempt for modelling some symptoms of psychosis in man
Boeijinga et al.
J Psychopharmacol 2007;21:321-337.
ABSTRACT  

A Randomized Trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate Antagonist in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression.
Zarate et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006;63:856-864.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.