This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on ISI (10)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letters  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Stress  • Public Health  • Violence and Human Rights  • Bioterrorism  • Human Rights  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Alert me on articles by topic

Is the Distinction Real or Apparent?

Metin Baolu, MD, PhD; Maria Livanou, PhD; Cvetana Crnobari, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(3):277-285.

Context  After the reports of human rights abuses by the US military in Guantanamo Bay, Iraq, and Afghanistan, questions have been raised as to whether certain detention and interrogation procedures amount to torture.

Objective  To examine the distinction between various forms of ill treatment and torture during captivity in terms of their relative psychological impact.

Design and Setting  A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a population-based sample of survivors of torture from Sarajevo in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Banja Luka in Republica Srpska, Rijeka in Croatia, and Belgrade in Serbia.

Participants  A total of 279 survivors of torture accessed through linkage sampling in the community (Banja Luka, Sarajevo, and Rijeka) and among the members of 2 associations for war veterans and prisoners of war (Belgrade).

Main Outcome Measures  Scores on the Semi-structured Interview for Survivors of War, Exposure to Torture Scale, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, and Clinician-Administered PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder) Scale for DSM-IV.

Results  Psychological manipulations, humiliating treatment, exposure to aversive environmental conditions, and forced stress positions showed considerable overlap with physical torture stressors in terms of associated distress and uncontrollability. In regression analyses, physical torture did not significantly relate to posttraumatic stress disorder (odds ratio, 1.41, 95% confidence interval, 0.89-2.25) or depression (odds ratio, 1.41, 95% confidence interval, 0.71-2.78). The traumatic stress impact of torture (physical or nonphysical torture and ill treatment) seemed to be determined by perceived uncontrollability and distress associated with the stressors.

Conclusions  Ill treatment during captivity, such as psychological manipulations, humiliating treatment, and forced stress positions, does not seem to be substantially different from physical torture in terms of the severity of mental suffering they cause, the underlying mechanism of traumatic stress, and their long-term psychological outcome. Thus, these procedures do amount to torture, thereby lending support to their prohibition by international law.

Author Affiliations: Section of Trauma Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, University of London, London, England (Drs Baolu and Livanou); and Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Hospital Zvezdara, Belgrade, Serbia (Dr Crnobari).

RELATED LETTERS

Torture, Culture, War Zone Exposure, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Criterion A’s Bracket Creep
H. Stefan Bracha and Kentaro Hayashi
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(1):115-116.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Torture, Culture, War Zone Exposure, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Criterion A’s Bracket Creep—Reply
Metin Basoglu and Maria Livanou
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(1):116-117.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Science and Torture
Steven H. Miles
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(3):275-276.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT