You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 3, March 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Neurology
 •Dementias
 •Neurogenetics
 •Psychiatry, Other
 •Diagnosis
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Economic Evaluation of an Integrated Diagnostic Approach for Psychogeriatric Patients

Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Claire A. G. Wolfs, PhD; Carmen D. Dirksen, PhD; Alfons Kessels, MD, MSc; Johan L. Severens, PhD; Frans R. J. Verhey, PhD, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(3):313-323.

Context  Because of the increasing number of elderly people with dementia, the costs of dementia and dementia care are expected to grow rapidly in the coming decades. Cost-effectiveness results are relevant for decision making about new strategies in dementia care.

Objective  To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an integrated multidisciplinary diagnostic facility for diagnosing dementia in ambulatory psychogeriatric patients.

Design  Randomized controlled trial with an economic evaluation component.

Setting  The Maastricht Evaluation of a Diagnostic Intervention for Cognitively Impaired Elderly, Maastricht University Hospital, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Patients  A total of 137 patients who received care in the multidisciplinary diagnostic facility and 93 who received usual care.

Main Outcome Measures  Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) as the main outcome measure and cognition and behavioral problems as secondary outcome measures.

Results  Compared with patients receiving usual care, patients who visited the diagnostic facility gained a mean 0.05 QALY at the extra cost of {euro}65. The incremental cost per QALY amounted to {euro}1267. This point estimate lies beneath commonly accepted thresholds and is within an acceptable range of uncertainty. With regard to the secondary analyses, cost-effectiveness results showed a substantial amount of uncertainty and were therefore indecisive.

Conclusion  On the basis of the main cost-per-QALY analysis, the use of the integrated multidisciplinary diagnostic facility is cost-effective for the diagnosis and management of dementia in ambulatory patients.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00402311


Author Affiliations: Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Drs Wolfs, Dirksen, Kessels, and Severens); and Departments of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology (Drs Wolfs and Verhey) and Health Organization, Policy and Economics (Dr Severens), Maastricht University, Maastricht.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of General Psychiatry
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(3):233.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.