You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 57 No. 3, March 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Psychiatry, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Community Diagnosis Counts

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57:223-224.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

IN THIS issue of the ARCHIVES, Murphy et al1-2 and Eaton et al3 provide new data to address current issues involving the distinction between psychopathology and normal mental states as well as the assessment of specific mental disorders in community settings.4-7 The 40-year Stirling County Study1 and the 13-year follow-up of the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) study3 provide a valuable longitudinal perspective on the clinical course of persons identified with mental disorders in epidemiologic surveys. Both studies have the added dimension of comparing diagnoses made by nonclinicians using highly structured instruments with diagnoses made by clinicians using structured clinical interviews.

STRUCTURED CLINICAL INTERVIEW AND HIGHLY STRUCTURED LAY INTERVIEW COMPARISONS

These studies address a nagging concern raised by the high lifetime prevalence rates of mental disorders identified in epidemiologic surveys such as the ECA study,8 the National Comorbidity Survey,9 and the historic Stirling County Study10—namely, would rates be much lower if psychiatrists or other mental health specialists could . . . [Full Text of this Article]


VALIDITY OF HIGHLY STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS

A LONGITUDINAL PERSPECTIVE

SUMMARY

RELATED ARTICLES

A 40-Year Perspective on the Prevalence of Depression: The Stirling County Study
Jane M. Murphy, Nan M. Laird, Richard R. Monson, Arthur M. Sobol, and Alexander H. Leighton
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(3):209-215.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Self-report and Clinical Diagnostic Interviews for Depression: Diagnostic Interview Schedule and Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry in the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area Follow-up
William W. Eaton, Karen Neufeld, Li-Shiun Chen, and Guojun Cai
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(3):217-222.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Controversies in Community-Based Psychiatric Epidemiology: Let the Data Speak for Themselves
Dan G. Blazer II and Berton H. Kaplan
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(3):227-228.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Diagnostic Interviews for Depression in the Stirling County Study: Challenges for Psychiatric Epidemiology
Jane M. Murphy, Richard R. Monson, Nan M. Laird, Arthur M. Sobol, and Alexander H. Leighton
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(3):230-236.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Mild Disorders Should Not Be Eliminated From the DSM-V
Kessler et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:1117-1122.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.