 |
 |

The Toll of Refugee Status and the State of Trauma Research
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:483-484.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
METHODS for studying traumatized populations have advanced substantially
in recent decades. Trauma research has integrated basic methodological procedures
into its standard repertoire, advancing from open-ended interviews of selected
trauma survivors to rigorous studies of epidemiology. This is no small feat
given that trauma is an inherently difficult subject for scientific investigation.
The study by Van Ommeren et al1 of tortured
Bhutanese refugees in Nepal in this issue of the ARCHIVES has vanquished a
myriad of methodological obstacles through application of systematic research
tools. It has provided important data about a difficult-to-penetrate subject
in this underserved and underrecognized population with clearly unmet mental
health needs.
Careful attention to methodological issues in this study resulted in
numerous elements worthy of mention. These included (1) a longitudinal design,
from 1995 to 1997; (2) a large sample size (526 tortured subjects and 526
nontortured sex- and age-matched comparison subjects); (3) random subject
selection from . . . [Full Text of this Article]
RELATED ARTICLE
Psychiatric Disorders Among Tortured Bhutanese Refugees in Nepal
Mark Van Ommeren, Joop T. V. M. de Jong, Bhogendra Sharma, Ivan Komproe, Suraj B. Thapa, and Etzel Cardeña
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58(5):475-482.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|