You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 65 No. 12, December 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics
 •Child Development
 •Child Psychiatry
 •Psychiatry, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Women's Health
 •Pregnancy and Breast Feeding
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Breastfeeding, Breast-Milk Feeding, Breast Feeding, and IQ: Unknown and Known Knowns

Anthony Grant Gordon, BSc

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT) Study Group1 is to be congratulated on acquiring much new data on the important but neglected topic of breastfeeding and IQ. However, as well as the known unknowns, the unknown knowns need just as much attention. The literature review (for which none of the authors took responsibility!) omitted many pertinent facts that would have simplified interpretation of their results. A major obstacle to scientific progress, especially in this field, is the known knowns, "what you know for sure that ain't so" (Mark Twain). Myths kill. Crucially, Donald Rumsfeld ignored known knowns! The mechanical sompe theory2 was designed to explain why certain serious infections were more common in nonbreastfed infants, but it covers a wider field and explains otherwise odd findings.1 It has also led to a critical evaluation of competing beliefs.

The first critical distinction to be made in . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Breastfeeding and Child Cognitive Development: New Evidence From a Large Randomized Trial
Michael S. Kramer, Frances Aboud, Elena Mironova, Irina Vanilovich, Robert W. Platt, Lidia Matush, Sergei Igumnov, Eric Fombonne, Natalia Bogdanovich, Thierry Ducruet, Jean-Paul Collet, Beverley Chalmers, Ellen Hodnett, Sergei Davidovsky, Oleg Skugarevsky, Oleg Trofimovich, Ludmila Kozlova, Stanley Shapiro, and for the Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT) Study Group
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(5):578-584.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Breastfeeding, Breast-Milk Feeding, Breast Feeding, and IQ: Unknown and Known Knowns—Reply
Michael S. Kramer and Robert W. Platt
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(12):1458-1459.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.