 |
 |

Tailoring Treatment to Parental Values: A Comment on TADS
David Antonuccio, PhD
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
When considering efficacy, the Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS),1 in my view the best comparative study ever done in children with depression, ranks the acute outcome of the treatments from best to worst this way: combination treatment, followed by fluoxetine hydrochloride therapy alone, followed by cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) alone, followed by placebo. Analysis of longer-term efficacy2 suggests that CBT caught up with fluoxetine therapy at the 18-week follow-up and CBT caught up with the combination treatment at the 36-week follow-up (81% response for CBT, 81% response for fluoxetine therapy, and 85% response for combination treatment). When considering safety, the acute treatment rankings from best to worst were entirely different1: CBT alone was best, followed by placebo, followed by combination treatment, followed by fluoxetine therapy alone. These safety rankings were maintained (suicidal events were 6.3% in CBT, 8.4% in combination treatment, and 14.7% in . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
The Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS): Long-term Effectiveness and Safety Outcomes
The TADS Team
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(10):1132-1143.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Fluoxetine, Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, and Their Combination for Adolescents With Depression: Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS) Randomized Controlled Trial
Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study Team
JAMA. 2004;292(7):807-820.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTER
Tailoring Treatment to Parental Values: A Comment on TADS—Reply
John S. March and for the TADS Team
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(6):723-724.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|