You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 7, July 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Psychosocial Issues
 •Psychopharmacology
 •Psychotherapy
 •Public Health
 •Substance Abuse/ Alcoholism
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Genetics
 •Genetic Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Questionable Efficacy for Naltrexone in Patients With Asp40

Jeffrey A. Mattes, MD

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The article by Anton et al1 is less positive than it may appear. They find evidence that patients with the Asp40 allele are more likely to respond to naltrexone hydrochloride treatment for alcoholism, but only if they received medical management (MM) alone, not if they also received combined behavioral intervention (CBI). They explain this by saying that CBI

may have compensated for the placebo effect, thereby suppressing the chances of observing a main effect of naltrexone or a genetic interaction.1(p140)

But does this make any sense? If CBI achieved such a good effect that a ceiling effect was evident, the statement might have some meaning. However, the graphs do not indicate any overall effect of CBI. Anton et al further state that CBI might have reduced "interindividual variability," which might have made it less likely for the "naltrexone and naltrexone x gene interaction to emerge."1(p140) However, . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

An Evaluation of µ-Opioid Receptor (OPRM1) as a Predictor of Naltrexone Response in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: Results From the Combined Pharmacotherapies and Behavioral Interventions for Alcohol Dependence (COMBINE) Study
Raymond F. Anton, Gabor Oroszi, Stephanie O’Malley, David Couper, Robert Swift, Helen Pettinati, and David Goldman
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(2):135-144.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Questionable Efficacy for Naltrexone in Patients With Asp40—Reply
Raymond F. Anton, Gabor Oroszi, Stephanie O’Malley, David Couper, Robert Swift, Helen Pettinati, and David Goldman
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(7):796-797.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.